Tonight's Candidates' Forum presented a striking contrast on the only contested race. (My handout is at left but as an unopposed candidate is simply informational).
Rather than re-create the forum, I will annotate the article written by Annette Baird of the Houston Chronicle. My comments appear below in red.
____________
April 25, 2007, 11:47PM
Spring Branch trustees state their positions at forum
By ANNETTE BAIRD
Chronicle Correspondent
The incumbent running for a third term in the upcoming Spring Branch
school board elections pledged to take the district beyond TAKS and use
taxpayer money wisely if he is elected to a third term.
David Converse, 51, said his long experience volunteering in the
district, his commitment to kids, his passion for education and
unfinished business were the main reasons he was running again.
Challenger Brigitte Laki expressed support for a school voucher
system. She also voiced concerns about a possible bond issue for a
facilities-improvement program and touted total immersion for all
non-English speaking students. Ms. Laki has been to very few of our schools and is unfamiliar with our recently adopted significant revision to accelerated English language acquisition.
The two candidates, along with Susan Mathews and Mike Falick, both
of whom are running unopposed for a second term, fielded questions
about everything from their own voting records and district facilities
to the superintendent's job performance on Wednesday night at a
candidates' forum.
Citing his long experience serving the school district in various
capacities, Falick, 43, blasted Laki for her lack of knowledge and
experience on district issues and her nonexistent voting record in
school board elections. (As an aside, I'm 41....). Ms. Laki has never voted in a SBISD School Board election despite living in the District for a decade +. As I said at the Forum, the first vote you cast should not be the vote you cast for yourself.
"It is not OK to say 'you should vote for me because I'm a taxpayer,' " Falick said. It's not being a taxpayer that is the issue. Rather it's the lack of participation -- no voting history, lack of volunteerism, lack of attendance at Board and budget meetings, etc.
"I guess I'm the spoiler," Laki told about 30 people in attendance.
Laki, 59, cited her experience as a parent of two Memorial High
School graduates and her longtime management experience at ExxonMobil
before retiring four years ago.
She said she was running because taxes had gone up while the quality
of the schools has not. Laki said the district has had an "acceptable"
rating, not the highest ranking attainable, in the state's
accountability system during Converse's time in office. What Ms. Laki seems to miss is that we are a Robin Hood district. Her entire increase, as all of our increases in property value and the resulting increase in taxes has gone out of Spring Branch. We have maintained a flat tax. In addition, the broken rating system based on the lowest common denominator does not take into account the success experienced by our schools.
Converse, a research scientist with ExxonMobil, said he has worked
on the district's long-term plans that address education, technology
and facilities. He said his experience and continuity are needed to
implement them.
While the incumbents agreed that many district facilities are aging
and in need of renovations or replacement, Laki said the need for a
bond issue is overblown. I believe Ms. Laki needs to visit our schools before she can render this opinion.
"Most facilities are in good condition," she said. "I don't think you need to raze buildings to the ground." While some schools may need to be razed, i.e., those where the cost of replacement is close to the cost to repair/maintain, all do not. That is why we have the Long Range Facilities Plan.
Converse disagreed. He said the district has significant facilities
needs. He pointed out that an 80-member bond committee is studying the
district's needs.
Mathews, 48, said a bond election is critical to finance improved facilities.
"We have had a history of deferred maintenance," she said, adding
that the bond committee will advise the board on how much and what the
money should be spent on.
Recent Comments